Imagine email providers like Gmail or Outlook constantly analyzing the emails you receive. They pay attention not just to the sender's address but also to a combination of elements within the email itself. This includes content, subject lines, design elements, and even sending times. When these elements consistently appear together and trigger low engagement (opens, clicks) or high spam complaints, a "fingerprint" is formed.
This fingerprint acts like a digital red flag for email providers. If your high-volume sending patterns – content style, subject lines, etc. – start to resemble a known spam fingerprint, your emails are more likely to be flagged and filtered out of inboxes.
A "bad" sender reputation isn't solely based on a single factor like a negative IP address. Instead, it's the cumulative effect of your sending patterns creating a fingerprint that screams "spam" to mailbox providers.
To understand fingerprinting, let’s take an example.
Imagine a startup that uses cold email campaigns to acquire new customers. They send generic, one-size-fits-all cold emails with a subject line like "Grow Your Business with {Company_Name}!.
They send this email to a large purchased list with limited targeting or personalization. Open and reply rates are very low. Now, mailbox providers will notice the repetitive elements of the emails and how they combine with low engagement rates, creating a fingerprint.
The result? Future cold emails from them are more likely to be flagged as spam and filtered out of inboxes, hindering their outreach efforts.
Here are some key strategies to mitigate the negative impact of fingerprinting on your high-volume email deliverability:
We help you personalize your outreach at scale.
